| Bryston Customer
Feedback
Email: RE: RE: BP25DA and PMC IB1S Speakers
I'm sure you've heard about many systems, and the only reason I'm
adding my experience to that long list is that you seem genuinely
and enthusiastically interested in what these experiences are.
Audio has been a hobby of mine for over thirty years, but I've
never been technically up to speed, nor have I had the opportunity
to listen to super high-end systems given the places I've lived,
and the modest means I've had at my disposal. My only claim to fame
is that I've been a careful consumer, researching each component
as well as I could before buying it. I've changed my systems a number
of times, with the concomitant drain on my financial reserves, and
now that I'm retired, those reserves must be husbanded very carefully.
Nevertheless, I have made a major upgrade that has given me what
I've been seeking for these past 30 years plus.
My most recent system, until now, had consisted of the following:
- Hales Revelation III speakers
- 7BST mono-blocks
- A Z-Systems RDQ1 used as a preamp
- A Theta Jade CD transport system
- A Sony ES five CD player
- A Theta ProBasic IIIa DAC
As you can see, this was an all-digital setup. The reason is that
as a young hobbyist, I got entirely fed up with vinyl. There were
long periods during which I didn't listen to music at all because
I spent more time listening to the flaws in discs than I did to the
music. I even gave away all my old vinyl discs! So I became, and remain,
an unabashed devotee to the digital side of the great debate among
enthusiasts.
I do not, however, engage in debate since I learned from the early
days of my hobby that thousands of different speakers, for example,
are manufactured, not to mention all the other gear, because people
have different tastes, as they do in music itself. It is pointless,
not to say impolite, for anyone to challenge another person's taste.
So my recent upgrade was focussed, not only because of my preconceived
"philosophy," but also for the practical reality that
one cannot audition everything within a lifetime.
My focus was narrowed even more by the fact that I've owned Bryston
components for over 24 years, and have been pleased with what they
produce as well as their well-earned reputation for quality. In
short, my search started on the basis of trust in a company I knew
well. I learned that Bryston brought out a new preamp, the Bryston
BP20DA, with a DAC built-in. Reading about it, I talked to the Bryston
folks who told me about the experience they had with it. They were
confident, not surprisingly, that the DAC in the unit would sound
a lot better that the Theta ProBasic. As a matter of faith in Bryston,
I ordered one, and, if anything, found they had, in my opinion,
undersold the merits of that DAC. I simply took the Theta DAC out
of the system because the difference, in terms, of the life-like
sound was like night and day.
I was so impressed, that I wanted to explore the key component
in my system: the speakers. I have loved the sound of my Hales for
many years. You will recall that it was the subject of a rave Stereophile
review, which I think was right on the money. But, again, Bryston
had never failed me and they thought if I liked the sound they were
striving for, I might like to try a PMC speaker, which they distribute
in North America. Again I researched a specific model, the PMC IB1S,
only to discover that Stereophile gave the speaker one of its patented
"killing-with-faint-praise" reviews. I also have had good
experience with Stereophile, so I was caught a bit between it and
Bryston as the historical recipients of my trust. The reviewer's
criticism was that he felt the IB1s were light in the bottom end,
but in a communication with me conceded to me, quite objectively
and honestly I thought, that they might sound better in my listening
room.
Armed with the review which helped my zero in on potential problem
areas, I auditioned the speakers at home. In this case, again, I
had to give Bryston the thumbs up. The speakers sound spectacular
in my listening room, particularly in combination with the Bryston
BP20DA, so I bought the speakers. This combination brings out everything
on the disc; that means if the source material is great, the sound
is great, but if it's not good, the sound can be pretty ugly. That's
why they're studio monitors. It also means that if listeners are
looking for a certain kind of coloration in their sound reproduction,
they should look elsewhere. But I'm finding that many discs, particularly
ones re-mastered from older recordings (pre 1970s) sound better
than ever. The bottom end, which troubled Stereophile, I find not
only to be just extended, powerful and accurate, but downright awesome.
The other part of my "philosophy" is that in reproduced
sound, if one is seeking "reality," the only available
reality is what the crew who record the music decide to release.
The producers, artists, engineers, mixers, end up after mixing,
eq, etc., etc., with an end product (something like a book after
drafts, revisions, and editing), that is the reality for the consumer
who reproduces it on a audio system. What I've been looking for,
and now feel I have, to the degree that the state-of-the-art provides,
and within the reach of the modestly endowed financially, is just
that kind of reproduction.
Thirty years is a long time to be looking for this sound, and many
thousands of dollars have been spent along the way. I would not
be so bold as to claim that I've found the Holy Grail of audio (especially
since so many folks are looking for different grails) but to these
ears, this is as close as it gets.
D.W
Coquitlam, B.C. Canada
All I can say is that it has been worth the time, money and travel.
|